Study for the AICP exam with the Planetizen AICP Test. Master concepts with multiple choice questions, hints, and explanations. Ace your exam!

Multiple Choice

Which case upheld the use of planned unit developments in Pennsylvania?

Planned unit developments provide flexibility in zoning by combining several uses under a single, unified master plan, with design standards and amenities negotiated to meet community goals. In Pennsylvania, this approach is supported by the Municipalities Planning Code, which allows municipalities to approve PUDs as a legitimate tool to implement a comprehensive plan and guide coordinated growth. The case Cheney v. Village 2 at New Hope specifically upheld the use of planned unit developments in Pennsylvania, affirming that a PUD can be a lawful and appropriate method to encourage innovative, mixed-use projects while meeting required standards and conditions. The other listed cases address different legal issues—eminent domain, a classic zoning framework, and private-town free-speech rights—so they do not establish Pennsylvania authority over PUDs.

Planned unit developments provide flexibility in zoning by combining several uses under a single, unified master plan, with design standards and amenities negotiated to meet community goals. In Pennsylvania, this approach is supported by the Municipalities Planning Code, which allows municipalities to approve PUDs as a legitimate tool to implement a comprehensive plan and guide coordinated growth. The case Cheney v. Village 2 at New Hope specifically upheld the use of planned unit developments in Pennsylvania, affirming that a PUD can be a lawful and appropriate method to encourage innovative, mixed-use projects while meeting required standards and conditions. The other listed cases address different legal issues—eminent domain, a classic zoning framework, and private-town free-speech rights—so they do not establish Pennsylvania authority over PUDs.