For annexation of 200 acres, which cost analysis method would be most appropriate to study fiscal effects?

Study for the AICP exam with the Planetizen AICP Test. Master concepts with multiple choice questions, hints, and explanations. Ace your exam!

Multiple Choice

For annexation of 200 acres, which cost analysis method would be most appropriate to study fiscal effects?

When a jurisdiction considers annexing land, the key question is how it will affect the local budget. The appropriate method is a fiscal impact analysis, which estimates the net fiscal effect by projecting both the revenues the new area will generate (property taxes, sales taxes, fees) and the costs it will incur (police, fire, schools, utilities, public works) over a planning horizon. This approach shows whether the annexation would create a positive or negative balance for the municipal budget, given the anticipated land use and service demands of the 200 acres. It directly targets the financial implications for local government, which is the core concern in evaluating annexation. Costs-only analyses focus only on what services cost, without weighing the corresponding revenues. Cost-benefit analysis looks at broader social benefits and costs beyond the local government budget, which isn’t the primary lens here. Cost-effectiveness analysis compares costs to a specific outcome, not the overall budget impact.

When a jurisdiction considers annexing land, the key question is how it will affect the local budget. The appropriate method is a fiscal impact analysis, which estimates the net fiscal effect by projecting both the revenues the new area will generate (property taxes, sales taxes, fees) and the costs it will incur (police, fire, schools, utilities, public works) over a planning horizon. This approach shows whether the annexation would create a positive or negative balance for the municipal budget, given the anticipated land use and service demands of the 200 acres. It directly targets the financial implications for local government, which is the core concern in evaluating annexation.

Costs-only analyses focus only on what services cost, without weighing the corresponding revenues. Cost-benefit analysis looks at broader social benefits and costs beyond the local government budget, which isn’t the primary lens here. Cost-effectiveness analysis compares costs to a specific outcome, not the overall budget impact.

More practice questions